Nadal Weathers Djokovic’s Comeback to Claim Ninth Rome Title

By Owen Lewis

Novak Djokovic, the world No. 1, and Rafael Nadal, the world No. 2, faced off in the final of the Italian Open today. It was the pair’s 54th meeting, an all-time record on the men’s side, with Djokovic leading 28-25. Djokovic, a 31-year-old from Serbia, had won the last two meetings: a five-set epic at Wimbledon last year and a straight-sets demolition of his rival at the Australian Open in January. However, the match took place on clay, Nadal’s favored surface- the 32-year-old Spaniard has dominated on clay throughout his career, winning 11 French Open titles and earning the reputation as the best clay-courter of all time. Although Nadal had gone without a title since the Rogers Cup in 2018, and was coming off three straight semifinal losses in clay tournaments this year, he stormed to the final without dropping a set, serving up three “bagels” along the way (also known as a 6-0 set). In the semifinals, the Spaniard took revenge on Stefanos Tsitsipas (who had beaten him in the semifinals of the Madrid tournament), 6-3, 6-4. During the match, Nadal produced some of his best tennis of the clay season, breaking in Tsitsipas’ first service game and storming to an encouraging straight-sets victory.

Djokovic had a tougher road to the final- he cruised through the opening two rounds, but was given a two-fisted battle in the quarterfinals by Juan Martin del Potro of Argentina. Although coming back from a long injury break from the game, “Delpo” saved several break points in the first set, while converting one of his chances to take the set 6-4. Djokovic went up a break in the second set, but the Argentine restored parity and forced a tiebreak. The world No. 1 had been the heavy favorite to win the match, but del Potro grabbed the first mini-break to go up 5-3, and soon found himself serving for the match up 6-4 in the breaker. But on the first match point, del Potro missed a forehand, and Djokovic deadlocked the score at 6-all with a delicate drop shot. The Serb then reeled off the next two points, pumping his arms and roaring in celebration. In the third set, Djokovic saved three break points before securing the decisive break at 2-all when Delpo buried a short forehand into the net. The first seed maintained his advantage, sealing the three-hour match with an ace down the middle.

In the semifinals, Djokovic went up against Diego Schwartzman, another Argentine. His style couldn’t be more different from del Potro’s, however- Schwartzman stands at just five feet, seven inches, and plays a defensive style with emphasis on return of serve. Del Potro is eleven inches taller and sports one of the game’s most feared forehands, which he often hits at speeds of over 100 mph. The shorter Argentine followed in del Potro’s footsteps, falling to Djokovic in a tight three-set match. Again, the Serb was the heavy favorite- to put it bluntly, he plays the same style of game as Schwartzman, but does each aspect of the game a little bit better. Djokovic was expected to be the constant aggressor, but his opponent played great tennis, hitting some exceptional drop shots throughout the match. Though Schwartzman failed twice to serve out the second set, he played a strong tiebreak, winning it 7-2. The world No. 1 was too strong in the decider, though, eventually winning 6-3, 6-7 (2), 6-3.

With Djokovic having spent five and a half hours on court in his previous two matches, there were doubts about his ability to endure a physical match against the King of Clay. On the other hand, Djokovic’s impressive win over Nadal at the Australian Open arguably made him the slight favorite to win the match.

Djokovic served first, and on the opening point of the match, the world No. 1 feathered a drop shot winner that landed just on Nadal’s side of the net. However, the promising start didn’t last, as the Spaniard begun to run Djokovic from corner to corner. After just a few points, it became bluntly obvious that Nadal was playing at his formidable best. Although the Serb hit a couple angled backhand winners and two aces in the first set, he was being outclassed in almost every rally, as Nadal hit winners from all over the court and drove his forehand up the line cleanly and consistently (which I strongly believe is the key for Nadal to perform well against the Serb). Trying to change tactics, Djokovic even attempted a couple moonballs, which Nadal gleefully pounced on. Djokovic had little luck on his service games in the first set and even less during Nadal’s, winning just a handful of points. In the 142 sets played between the two, not one had been a 6-0 bagel, and yet Nadal did not allow Djokovic a game in the first set: 6-0 Nadal.

Djokovic made it clear that he wasn’t going to fold in the first game of the second set, holding to love with the help of three aces. With Nadal serving at 1-2, the Serb earned his first break point of the match. It was saved in great style, though, when Nadal ran around a Djokovic forehand in order to hit a forehand of his own, which he ripped down the line for a winner. There were some dramatic rallies throughout the second set, including one with Djokovic serving at 3-3, love-30. Djokovic returned a Nadal smash, before a lob set up a smash of his own- which he rattled into the net. Over the course of the match, Djokovic missed another smash, and a tentative overhead allowed Nadal to a point he had no right to. Still, at 3-3 and love-40, though the end seemed nigh for Djokovic, all three break points went begging as Nadal missed a couple returns, his level finally starting to dip. Another break chance came and went for the Spaniard at 4-all, and finally, serving at 4-5, Nadal played a nervous game, eventually hitting wide on set point. Djokovic urged the crowd to applaud as the match was launched into a deciding set.

As the tide of the match slowly turned, Nadal had become slightly less aggressive, indicating that there might be a possibility for an astonishing Djokovic comeback. But the Serb failed to hold on to the momentum, and was broken immediately to start the third set (furiously smashing his racket on the clay afterward). Djokovic faced a break point in all of his service games in the decider, winning just one of them. Meanwhile, Nadal refocused admirably, returning to his aggressive style and dominating the anticlimactic third set: 6-1.

The pair had shared the record for most Masters 1000 wins on the men’s side prior to this match, as Djokovic’s victory in Madrid evened the score at 33-33. With Nadal winning his ninth Rome title, he retakes the lead with 34 and closes the gap in the head-to-head to just two matches: 28-26. Perhaps more importantly, Nadal’s win establishes him as the favorite for Roland Garros. A 12th victory at the French Open would bring Nadal to 18 grand slams- two away from Roger Federer’s record of 20.

So Nadal is the favorite to win the French Open title this year, with Djokovic a slight second. If the Italian Open is anything to go off of, it should be an entertaining tournament. And it starts in just a few days.

Novak Djokovic Tops Stefanos Tsitsipas to Win the Mutua Madrid Open

By Owen Lewis

Novak Djokovic is beginning to rediscover his form. After three consecutive early losses at Indian Wells, Miami, and Monte-Carlo, he’s made the finals of his second clay court tournament of the year: the Mutua Madrid Open. In his opening matches, the world No. 1 did not drop a set to Taylor Fritz or Jeremy Chardy, though the latter had a set point in the second set of their match. In the semifinal, he faced a red-hot Dominic Thiem- the winner of the recent Barcelona tournament and last year’s French Open runner-up. Thiem had conquered Rafael Nadal (an 11-time French Open champion and the undisputed greatest clay-courter of all time) in the semifinals of Barcelona, and maintained his fine form in Madrid, beating Roger Federer in the quarterfinals, saving two match points. Thiem, a 25-year-old from Austria, is quickly making a name for himself on clay, and I made him my personal favorite to beat Djokovic. But Djokovic was up for the challenge, winning an intense match in two closely contested sets: 7-6 (2), 7-6 (4). Thiem had been up a break in both sets, but couldn’t sustain his advantage as Djokovic, this year’s Australian Open champion, played his best tennis since Down Under.

Such form has propelled Djokovic, a 31-year-old from Serbia and the owner of 15 major titles, into the final of the Madrid Open. The other semifinal pitted Nadal against 20-year-old Stefanos Tsitsipas, a 20-year-old from Greece and one of the leaders of the “NextGen”, the younger tennis players who have yet to establish themselves in the majors. Nadal was the heavy favorite for the match. He hits a forehand with vicious topspin, which makes the ball bounce higher. This can wreak havoc on players with one-handed backhands, forcing them to hit the ball up around their eyes. Tsitsipas has a one-handed backhand, but managed to counter Nadal’s spin with consistent, aggressive play. He pulled off the shock upset, winning 6-4, 2-6, 6-3 and saving 11 out of the 16 break points that he faced. The match marked Nadal’s third straight semifinal loss on clay- a season that he usually dominates (for reference, since 2005, Nadal has won 11 out of 14 French Opens- virtually unprecedented dominance- on any surface). With the French Open coming up in two weeks, Nadal, the two-time defending champion, has much to be concerned about. On the other side of the net, Tsitsipas recorded his first career win over Nadal and earned a final against Djokovic.

Djokovic is no doubt the favorite, though Tsitsipas has come out on top in their only career meeting- winning 6-3, 6-7 (5), 6-3 at the Rogers Cup in Toronto. Djokovic is an established player on clay- though 14 of his 15 majors have come from other surfaces, he won the French Open in 2016 and owns seven career wins over Nadal on clay, more than any other player. Tsitsipas, on the other hand, is in the early stages of his career, but many believe he will be a world No. 1 and major winner in the future. He made the semifinals of the Australian Open in January, but was demolished by Nadal, who in turn was crushed by Djokovic in the final.

In the first game of the match, with Djokovic serving, Tsitsipas had a sniff of a break at 15-30 but missed two returns and then netted what should have been a gimme of a forehand winner. He was then broken to 15 after missing a couple of impatient groundstrokes. Djokovic played beautiful tennis throughout the first set, pummeling the weaker backhand wing of Tsitsipas and hitting darting forehand winners from all over the court. The Greek youngster seemed to have a plan, hitting several drop shots, but Djokovic would constantly reach them and the gambit wasn’t particularly successful. The world No. 1 maintained his break advantage and served out the set to 15: 6-3.

It was crucial for Tsitsipas not to drop serve at the start of the second set, and a forehand winner sealed a hold to 15. Djokovic returned the favor, and then forced two break points on the Greek’s next service game. Tsitsipas supporters could hear the Jurassic Park theme song playing softly in the background, but he escaped danger with a big serve and a missed backhand from Djokovic. The underdog couldn’t seize the momentum, though, and the Serb restored parity with a hold to 30. Serving at 2-all, a couple of winners helped Tsitsipas to 40-love, but a loose point and a double fault brought up 40-30. Still, an overhead winner sealed the game for the Greek and kept his nose out in front for 3-2. Djokovic had not faced a break point or even been pushed to deuce up to this point, and though he was pegged back to 40-30 from 40-love, he held for the ninth time in a row: 3-3. So far in the match, Djokovic had 21 winners against 13 unforced errors, and Tsitsipas 19 winners and 15 mistakes. A +8 versus +4 differential isn’t enormous by any means, but Tsitsipas was consistently failing to make a mark on the Djokovic serve.

At 3-all, Tsitsipas was pushed to 30-30, but a missed Djokovic return brought up game point. The Greek hit a bullet forehand down the line from what seemed a difficult position, and the world No. 1 couldn’t keep his next shot in the court: 4-3. Djokovic faced minimal resistance in his next service game, winning it to love to even the set once again. And the Greek’s swan song began in the next game- at 15-all, Tsitsipas hit a huge serve but didn’t let Djokovic’s desperate return bounce, allowing Djokovic to eventually pass him at the net (honestly, I can’t make this mistake sound bad enough; if he had let the ball bounce he would have had all the time in the world to hit a winner). Down 15-30, the Greek made an ill-advised charge to the net and was passed again, bringing up two break points for Djokovic. Tsitsipas then missed a forehand after a brief rally, setting up the Serb to serve for the match at 5-4. The final game wasn’t without drama, with Djokovic going up 40-15, two match points, then losing them, then getting a time violation warning at deuce. But though Tsitsipas saved a third championship point, a fourth wasn’t long in coming. Djokovic toed the line, bounced the ball 16 times, then ended a rally with a forehand winner to win the Madrid Open. The victory ties him with Rafael Nadal’s record of 33 Masters 1000 titles, and is an ominous indication to other players that he is back in form. Will he claim his 16th major title at the French Open?

Daniil Medvedev Stuns Novak Djokovic in Monte Carlo

By Owen Lewis

What’s going on with Novak Djokovic? After his dominant Australian Open win in January, he’s suffered a significant dip in form. Early losses to Philipp Kohlschreiber and Roberto Bautista Agut in Indian Wells and Miami have shown that the world No. 1 is vulnerable, but this match further exposed Djokovic’s struggles. He hit nearly fifty unforced errors in the 3-6, 6-4, 2-6 loss. Considering that he hit fourteen unforced errors in his semifinal and final matches at the Australian Open (combined: five unforced errors in the semifinal and nine in the final), this is a mind-boggling stat. Medvedev deserves all the credit for this win (his 21st of the year, he leads the tour), but in parallel to his losses at the end of the hard court season, Djokovic looked flat. Let’s take a look at the match.

Djokovic won the toss, electing to serve, and Medvedev jumped on him right away. After extracting a couple of errors from the Serb, the up-and-coming Russian belted a forehand winner while up 15-40. He then held to love, quickly consolidating the break. Djokovic was a mess in the first set, missing two overheads and hitting drop shots into the net. One of the hardest things about playing Djokovic is usually that he gives his opponent so little- again, if we look at his AO victory, he committed just nine unforced errors against Rafael Nadal in the final. But by the time Medvedev had broken again to win the set, the traditionally solid Serb had hit about 20 unforced errors. Medvedev, despite landing less than half of his first serves, did not face a break point in the opening set. Something about the Russian’s game seems to throw Djokovic a little off balance. Between their close four-setter in Australia and this match, Medvedev played almost patiently- he has a solid backhand, but doesn’t often use it to hit winners against Djokovic. Rather, he is content to draw the Serb into long rallies, waiting for his opponent to make a mistake. He also hits flat and sometimes without much pace, which seems to sometimes rattle Djokovic. Anyway, Medvedev hugged the baseline in the opening set, converting two of five break points and taking the set 6-3.

The second set begun with Medvedev holding, then forcing a break point on Djokovic’s serve in the next game. With the underdog a point away from a 6-3, 2-0 lead, it felt like the match could be in the balance, but the Serb closed out the game. At 1-all, Djokovic had his first break points of the match, going up 15-40. Though Medvedev fought back to deuce, the world No. 1 forced another break chance and converted this one with a clever drop shot-lob combination. The rest of the set went with serve: Djokovic was hitting his forehand with more pace, beginning to push his six-five opponent around the court. He also let loose with a flurry of drop shots Serving at 5-4, the Serb sealed a love hold with back-to-back aces to level the match.

Medvedev served to open the third set, quickly falling behind love-30. He had a trainer massage his legs throughout the set, indicating that a longer match wouldn’t be in his favor, but the Russian played exceptionally well in the final set. Fighting back from the deficit with some huge serves, he held for 1-0. Djokovic’s first service game didn’t indicate by any means that he would be broken three times in the set: he held to love with a couple forehand winners. Serving down 1-2, though, Djokovic’s undoing began. Medvedev, staying consistent from the baseline, broke for a 3-1 lead, then held to love in just over a minute, decisively grabbing the momentum of the final set. Still, he got more treatment on the changeover- a Djokovic comeback still seemed entirely possible. The Serb didn’t seem to grasp the importance of the next game, though- he fell behind love-30, putting Medvedev just six points away from the biggest win of his career. Djokovic fought back to 30-all, but then surrendered the game with some more forehand errors.

Serving up 5-1, the magnitude of the match seemed to finally hit Medvedev, and he was broken to 15, with his only point being a backhand winner that seemed returnable but Djokovic didn’t try to reach. With the Serb serving down 2-5, he went up 30-love but an error, a Medvedev winner, and a double fault brought up 30-40 and match point. The Russian played an aggressive point, moving Djokovic around. The world No. 1 finally hit a forehand that sat up nicely in the middle of the court for Medvedev, who ripped an inside-out backhand winner to seal an impressive win.

So, a huge win for the 23-year-old Medvedev. But Djokovic put up much less resistance than any would expect- the third set was, to put it bluntly, a thrashing. He was broken five times and made around 30 unforced errors on his forehand side. He also seemed complacent, with minimal celebrations upon turning the match around in the second set, and didn’t show much frustration either. This match was a surprise for a couple reasons: Djokovic’s opening round win against Philipp Kohlschreiber was very shaky, but he looked imperious in his second-round demolition of Taylor Fritz. Second, clay is Medvedev’s worst surface, with minimal success on the dirt: he lost in the opening round of four clay tournaments last year.

This is a streak of poor performances almost akin to his losses to players such as Taro Daniel and Benoit Paire last year. It’s almost definitely not career-threatening, and recently he’s produced his best tennis at the majors, but one thing is for sure: if he doesn’t return to his previous form, his title defenses in the second half of the year are in serious doubt, and there’s very little chance of him toppling Rafael Nadal at the French Open.

In my previous article, I named Djokovic, Nadal, Dominic Thiem and Roger Federer as the favorites to perform well in the clay season. Thiem lost weakly to Dusan Lajovic of Serbia, 6-3, 6-3 yesterday, and Djokovic’s loss to Medvedev leaves just Nadal in the Monte Carlo Masters (Federer is playing a selective schedule, and didn’t compete in Monte-Carlo this year). So Nadal is the overwhelming favorite to claim his 12th title in Monte Carlo (to put that in perspective, Djokovic has two). Still, I’m watching him play Guido Pella right now, who is up a break at 4-3 and was a point away from a 5-1 lead a few minutes ago. Still, with Djokovic out of the picture, I’ll be very surprised if the Spaniard doesn’t claim the 2019 Monte-Carlo title.

Questions or comments? Email me at owenlewis11801@gmail.com or leave a comment. Thanks for reading!

Top 10 Turning Point Matches in Men’s Tennis (2000s)

By Owen Lewis

10. Federer vs. Nadal, 2006 Rome Final

Final Score: 6-7 (0), 7-6 (5), 6-4, 2-6, 7-6 (5) Nadal

This match took place when the storied Federer-Nadal rivalry was still in its infancy. Federer, ranked No. 1, was the reigning champion at the Australian Open, Wimbledon, and the U.S. Open. He had won seven majors in the space of two-and-a-half years and was quickly becoming one of the game’s all-time best. 2nd-ranked Nadal had won the French Open the previous year, beating Federer in the semifinals, but hadn’t gone deep at any other major. He had, however, won fifty-two straight matches on clay. To this point, the head-to-head was 4-1 in Nadal’s favor.

Federer came out the stronger player, dominating the tiebreak even after missing a couple set points near the end of the set. Nadal fought back to take the lead before Federer comfortably won the fourth set to force a decider. This set had all the drama one can ask for. Federer broke early and went up 4-1, and was a point away from a 5-2 lead. Nadal broke back, but faced two match points at 5-6, 15-40. On both points, Federer went for forehand winners. On both points, he missed. Nadal forced a tiebreak, during which Federer led 3-1, 4-2, and 5-3. But Nadal reeled off the last four points of the match to seal a five-set, five-hour win.

Let’s look at the historical significance of this match. If Federer wins, it’s a best of five win over Nadal on clay, and a major confidence boost heading into the 2006 French Open, where he would attempt to win his fourth straight major. But Nadal wins, beats Federer in the final at the French in 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2011, and owns an 11-2 record against the Swiss on clay. Nadal owns eleven French Open titles-the most at a major for any male player, ever- and the Swiss owns just one. To this day, Federer hasn’t beaten Nadal in a best of five match on clay. In all, a backbreaking loss for Federer, and the start of dominance for Nadal.

9. Federer vs. Sampras, Wimbledon 4th Round, 2001

Final Score: 7-6 (7), 5-7, 6-4, 6-7 (2), 7-5 Federer

Pete Sampras was going for his fifth straight Wimbledon, a feat his opponent would accomplish in 2007. The previous year, Sampras had won his seventh Wimbledon with a four set win over Pat Rafter in the final. Federer was 19 at the time, and on the radar as an up-and-comer, but hadn’t really established himself yet. This victory would signal his arrival as a star.

The first set went to a tiebreak, with Federer hitting a great passing shot and a forehand winner on his way to a 9-7 win in the breaker. Though Sampras hit back, winning the second and fourth sets, Federer was matching the grass-court legend ace for ace. He hit several return winners during the match, and the American seemed a bit shell-shocked. The drama reached its height in the fifth set. With Federer serving at 4-all, Sampras had two break points, but the Swiss wiped them out with some clinical volleying. Then, with Sampras serving to stay in the match at 5-6, Federer grabbed a 15-40 lead and two match points. The 29-year-old defending champion got in a wide first serve to Federer’s forehand, who stroked a forehand return winner down the line. He sank to his knees in triumph and waved to the crowd after shaking hands with the vanquished champion.

As for historical significance, this match impacted both players. Sampras would never win another Wimbledon. He would win one more major, the 2002 U.S. Open, but then retired the following year. Federer, on the other hand, returned to win Wimbledon in 2003, and did not relinquish his title until 2008. He would follow up the loss with Wimbledon wins in 2009, 2012, and 2017, with the latter victory sealing his eighth Wimbledon- one more than Sampras.

One more historical tidbit: Sampras finished his career with 14 slams, at the time a record in men’s tennis. He was in attendance at the 2009 Wimbledon final- Federer vs. Roddick (another American). Federer was playing for history: he was sitting at 14 slams, tied with Sampras’s record. It was a brutal serving display from both players, with the match extending to 16-14 in the fifth set. And when Roddick shanked a forehand at 14-15 and match point down, and the Swiss leapt into the air, roaring with the knowledge that he stood alone in history, Sampras rose to his feet and applauded behind his sunglasses.

8. Federer vs. Tsitsipas, 4th round Australian Open 2019

Final Score: 6-7 (11), 7-6 (3), 7-5, 7-6 (5) Tsitsipas

This is more of a projected turning point, with the match happening so recently, but this match had a very similar feel to the Federer-Sampras Wimbledon match. Federer, the elder statesman and two-time defending champion and the 19-year-old Tsitsipas produced a high quality four-set match in this shocking upset. The defining stat of this match is that Federer was 0/12 on break points, an almost unheard of conversion rate from the Swiss. Although Federer won a very close first set, the up-and-coming Greek played brilliantly in the tense moments, coming to net off strong approach shots. Unusually, Federer’s traditionally strong forehand broke down under the Tsitsipas onslaught, and he committed 40 unforced errors off his usually more reliable wing. Federer had four set points for a two-set lead, and a total of eight break points in the second set, but couldn’t win any. He had two more break points in the third, and lost those too. Tsitsipas made the most of his chances, playing his best tennis in the crucial moments and outhitting the Swiss great from the baseline and outserving him: 20-12 in aces.

When Federer beat Sampras, he was a 19-year old with long hair. 17 and a half years later, he lost to a 20-year-old with a similar look and a similar game. The flashing one-handed backhand, the big serve, and the powerful forehand. It seemed that we could be watching a changing of the guard. For several reasons, however, it’s not that simple. Nadal and Djokovic are still secure at the top of the rankings, and Federer has been playing great tennis this year, with just two losses this year. But I expect Tsitsipas to be in the top five by the end of 2020. He’s already proven he can beat the best on the highest stage, something Alexander Zverev and Dominic Thiem have yet to do.

7. Djokovic vs. Federer, U.S. Open Semifinal 2010

Final Score: 5-7, 6-1, 5-7, 6-2, 7-5 Djokovic

These two had faced off at the U.S. Open in 2007, 2008, and 2009, with Federer winning all three meetings. At this point, Federer had won 16 grand slam titles, and Djokovic just one, the 2008 Australian Open. Federer had also made the past six U.S. Open finals, winning five. He was the No. 2 seed, Djokovic the No. 3. Federer won a close first set, but Djokovic hit back in a surprisingly lopsided second. The third and fourth sets were a near mirror image of the first two, and the drama would intensify in the fifth. With Djokovic serving at 4-5, he fell behind 15-40: two match points for the Swiss. Unbelievably, Djokovic elevated his game, hitting his forehand with brutal pace. He saved the first match point with an inside-out swing volley winner, and the second with a bullet forehand from the baseline. He would go on to break Federer at 5-all and serve out the match, with the Swiss wasting a break chance in the final game.

Djokovic would lose a four-set final to world No. 1 Rafael Nadal, but returned to take the title in 2011. This was Djokovic’s second win over Federer at a slam, and the start of a long period of dominance over the Swiss great at slams. He would go on to beat Federer at the U.S. Open the following year (farther down this list) and again at the same venue in 2015. He would win three slams in 2011, in one of the best years in tennis history. Federer, meanwhile, wouldn’t win another slam until 2012, and after this match has a 2-7 record against the Serb at the grand slams.

6. Djokovic vs. Federer, Australian Open Semifinal 2011

Final Score: 7-6 (3), 7-5, 6-4 Djokovic

I should mention there is also a fantastic highlight video for this match: watch it here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3O5gXuxiQQ

Unlike many of the matches on this list, this semifinal wasn’t an epic. Yes, it was especially high quality for a straight-set match but the winner wasn’t really in doubt for at least half the match. This was a decisive win marking Djokovic’s arrival as the heir to the tennis throne. Federer and Nadal had combined to win 21 of the last 23 slams before this match, and Nadal had bowed out in the quarterfinals. Andy Murray made the final on the other side of the bracket, and Djokovic would go on to beat him easily: 6-4, 6-2, 6-3. As Jacob Steinberg from The Guardian put it before their 2016 rematch, “In 2011, Novak Djokovic could have won with one hand behind his back and his shoelaces tied together”.

As for this match, Djokovic proved he was up for the challenge from the get-go. Serving first and up 30-15, he sent down back-to-back double faults for 30-40. On this point, Federer really went after a return, hitting it hard and deep, but Djokovic took control of the rally, sending the defending champion side to side. Despite exceptional defense from the Swiss, he couldn’t handle a darting crosscourt forehand. From there, Djokovic served beautifully, holding easily but for a pressure situation at 4-all. His “serve plus one” (a part of Djokovic’s game that I believe is severely underrated) was working beautifully- time and again, Djokovic would send down a big serve and put away a winner on the first ball. Still, Federer might have won the first set had he not opted to be passive in the tiebreak. In the second, Djokovic broke early but Federer broke back and then again, going up 5-2. He was three points from the set with Djokovic serving at 2-5, love-15, but the Serb held, then broke Federer when he was serving for the set. He then held again for 5-all, then went up love-40 on the defending champion’s next service game. Federer fought to 30-40, but there was no stopping the rampant Serb on the third point, who then held to love to take a two set lead (hitting a decisive backhand winner on set point). In the third, serving at 0-1, Djokovic saved a plethora of break points, rebounding to break in the next game to go up 2-1. Federer, with one last gesture of defiance, broke to level at 4-all, but dropped serve in the next game, letting his racket drop in disappointment. The world No. 3 then served out the match to claim a significant victory.

This match was the first of three slams Djokovic would win in 2011. The loss also marked the first time since 2002 that Federer had played a year without winning a major. He would go eighteen more months before adding another to his tally. At the time of this match, Federer had 16 slams to his name, and Djokovic one. Now, in 2019, Federer has 20, and Djokovic 15. Prior to the match, the Swiss was 4-2 against Djokovic in the slams, and after, he has two wins against seven losses. This match was a turning point not just in the rankings but in the rivalry as well.

5. Federer vs. del Potro, U.S. Open Final 2009

Final Score: 3-6, 7-6 (5), 4-6, 7-6 (4), 6-2 del Potro

Federer was the world No. 1 heading into this match, and had beaten the Argentine twice already that year- including a 6-3, 6-0, 6-0 thrashing at the Australian Open. At the French Open, however, del Potro put up a much sterner challenge, taking a two-sets-to-one lead before the Swiss stormed back to win in five sets (he would go on to win his first and only French Open title). Still, Federer was the overwhelming favorite going into the match. And he would come out playing brilliantly, winning the first set 6-3 and going up a break in the second. He maintained the break advantage, and served for the set at 5-4. When he went up 30-love, it seemed for all the world that the five-time defending champion would take a borderline insurmountable two-set lead. But del Potro fought to 30-all, and then hit a forehand bullet down the line. It was called out, and del Potro’s challenge showed the ball had caught the very edge of the line, meaning 30-40 and break point. Federer argued the call, seeming to think that HawkEye had picked up the wrong mark. Still, umpire Jake Garner upheld the call, and on the next point Federer stubbornly approached to del Potro’s forehand again. The big Argentine hit another forehand pass down the line, and there was no doubt about this one: five games all. The set went to a tiebreak and the “Tower of Tandil” sealed it with a massive inside-out forehand. Federer was unusually angry in this match, swearing at the umpire when del Potro was allowed to challenge after what the Swiss deemed too long a wait. Still, he won the third set 6-4. Despite fighting back from a break down in the fourth, Federer played a poor tiebreak and a worse fifth set, as del Potro stormed to his maiden grand slam title. Not only did this snap Federer’s streak of U.S. Open titles, but he has not won another one to date. It would have been his third straight slam, and he went on to win the one after as well, the 2010 Australian Open. This isn’t to say everything would’ve fallen into place for Federer, but if he had won this match, and still won the 2010 AO, it would have marked four in a row, a feat that he has not accomplished. The Flushing Meadows title is still del Potro’s only slam, but this match has always been the one that got away for the Swiss great.

4. Djokovic vs. Nadal, Australian Open Final 2012

Final Score: 5-7, 6-4, 6-2, 6-7 (5), 7-5 Djokovic

Djokovic was the world No. 1 heading into this match, having beaten Nadal in the past two slam finals, both in four sets. This match may be Nadal’s most gutting loss ever, and Djokovic’s finest win. For that, it deserves a place high on this list. To this point, Nadal had won ten slams to Djokovic’s four, but the Serb was coming off a brilliant year in 2011, including three slam wins. Going into the final, both had played exhausting semifinals: Djokovic won a five-hour epic over Andy Murray, while Nadal spent over four hours beating Roger Federer.

Djokovic had had Nadal’s number in 2011, beating him six times. But the No. 2 ranked Nadal made the stronger start, breaking in the fifth game to go up 3-2. Though Djokovic leveled a couple games later for 4-all, the Spaniard broke once again at 5-all, then served out the set. It was an 80-minute set, and only a hint of the grueling match to come. Djokovic secured the first break of the second set with a brutally precise volley, going up 3-1. He had a set point with Nadal serving at 2-5, and two more while serving for the set at 5-3, but Nadal broke back for 4-5. In my opinion, Nadal missed a great chance to take a two-set lead here. Djokovic had missed set points and lost the momentum, and if Nadal had held for 5-all, he might have ridden his three-game streak to a second set win. Instead, Nadal surrendered the set with a double fault when down set point. Djokovic pumped his fists and the match was level. In the third set, Djokovic started to take control, breaking twice and sealing the set with a running forehand winner.

The fourth set produced high quality tennis and extremely tense moments. With Nadal serving at 3-4, he fell behind 0-30 before Djokovic followed a good deep return with a cracking forehand winner into the corner. As he has done so many times in his career, Nadal produced his best tennis at the most desperate moment. Down 0-40, after a strong rally, Nadal rifled an inside-out forehand winner. A rare Djokovic miss followed, and at 30-40 the Spaniard wrong-footed Djokovic with a series of backhands down the line. An ace and another unreturned serve sealed the hold for Nadal, and he celebrated with some violent fist pumps. The set would go to a tiebreak, with the match clock already hovering around four-and-a-half hours. Djokovic grabbed a mini-break, then hit a forehand winner for a 5-3 lead. But Nadal was relentless from the back of the court, holding the line and forcing a couple of Djokovic misses for 5-all. The Spaniard then earned a set point after curving down a service winner. Down 5-6, Djokovic sent down a strong serve, then started to move Nadal side to side. Nadal sent back a forehand, and the Serb’s next shot went wide. Nadal dropped to his knees, pumped his fists and screamed. He’d forced the first ever five-setter between the two.

The fifth set capped this grueling match, lasting 74 minutes. The overall time would be 5 hours and 53 minutes, breaking the record that Nadal set with Verdasco three years earlier. Nadal hit an absurd winner early in the set, in the form of an inside-out bullet of a forehand struck above his head. The set consisted of solid holds through the first five games. Then, with Djokovic serving at 2-3 down, Nadal conjured a break point, just his fifth of the match in over five hours, and took it when the Serb hit long. This seemed like a crucial blow, but in the next game, the script would flip again. Up 4-2, 30-15, Nadal ran down a Djokovic volley and looked for all the world like he would bury it for a winner, but he missed the backhand down the line by inches when he had much more space to work with. This is regarded as one of the literal turning points of tennis history. Instead of a 40-15 lead, and two game points for 5-2, Nadal was at 30-all, and two strong returns secured the break back for Djokovic. At 4-all, with Nadal serving, the longest rally of the match took place after more than five hours and twenty minutes. When Djokovic hit long on the 31st shot, he immediately dropped to the ground in exhaustion. He would quickly get up though, and forced a break point in the game. Nadal survived to lead 5-4, but it was the last game the Spaniard would win in the epic contest. After holding to tie the set at 5-all, Djokovic took his second break point when Nadal hit an attempted drop shot into the net. There was no celebration, and Djokovic marched impassively to his chair with the knowledge that there was a bit more work to be done. Things were looking good for the No. 1 seed at 30-love, but he sent a sloppy smash into the net and some grueling defense from Nadal forced two errors, bringing up 30-40 and break point. Djokovic sent an angled backhand crosscourt, and the Spaniard’s stretched reply didn’t make it into the court. At deuce, Nadal clipped the net tape and the ball went out, bringing up championship point. Throughout the last couple points, the Serb was frantically praying for just one more point. And he would get it, sending down a huge serve and an inside-out forehand winner.

He dropped flat on his back, pumping his fists to the camera. Nadal tore off his headband, gritting his teeth. Djokovic rose, yelling to his box in triumph. After the gladiators hugged, the No. 1 player ripped open his shirt, roaring and letting the crowd touch him. During the trophy ceremony, the exhausted players stretched on the net before an official brought them chairs and bottles of water. This match showed that Djokovic was up for any test anyone had to offer. It was his third straight slam and a successful defense of his title from 2011. As for Nadal, he would get his revenge five months later, beating Djokovic in the 2012 French Open final in four sets.

3. Djokovic vs. Wawrinka, Australian Open 4th Round 2013

Final Score: 1-6, 7-5, 6-4, 6-7 (5), 12-10 Djokovic

-This match is incredibly exciting, and there’s a variety of highlights on YouTube. I suggest taking a look at this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pleqYnR2JPo

-Wawrinka’s level in the first set is truly frightening.

Although Djokovic won this match, it was a turning point for his vanquished opponent, Stan Wawrinka. Djokovic was the world No. 1 and two-time defending champion, while Wawrinka was relatively unknown as the 15th seed. But for the first set and a half of this match, Djokovic was utterly helpless against the Wawrinka onslaught. The Serb surrendered a quick break before Wawrinka broke again with a dazzling backhand winner. Blasting winners from all corners of the court, the Swiss fired an unreachable forehand to take the first set by a shockingly lopsided 6-1 scoreline. Djokovic was slipping and sliding around the court, looking at his shoes angrily. He broke to start the second, but was immediately broken back. Wawrinka held and then forced a break point with the Serb serving at 1-2. When Djokovic hit a forehand that hung up for Wawrinka, the Swiss crushed an inside-out backhand winner that had Djokovic gesturing to his box as if to say “what am I supposed to do?”

Wawrinka maintained his one-break lead until he served for a two-set lead at 5-3. A huge forehand and a lucky net cord brought him to 30-love, but the magnitude of a potential two-set lead seemed to shake the Swiss, and he committed four unforced errors in a row to surrender the break back. Djokovic then broke again and served out the set, belting a backhand winner down the line and clenching a fist. He’d weathered a ferocious assault from the 15th seed and now stood on level terms. In the first game of the third set, Djokovic played two exceptional defensive points and broke Wawrinka, celebrating with a huge roar. Though the Swiss broke back, Djokovic secured the decisive break of the set at 4-all, then won his service game to take a two-sets-to-one lead.

The fourth set was high quality throughout, with both players holding serve and ending rallies with winners. The set went to a tiebreak, where Wawrinka grabbed a mini-break with a bullet of a backhand down the line. The rest of the breaker went with serve: Djokovic saved two set points down 3-6, but the Swiss had one last set point serving at 6-5. He ran Djokovic around before clipping the top of the net, letting the world No. 1 back into the point. The Serb hit three cracking ground strokes before Wawrinka stroked a backhand down the line. With Djokovic back on the defensive, a thunderbolt cross-court backhand set up a Wawrinka forehand winner down the line. The crowd roared as the players headed to a fifth set.

The fifth set was a marathon, but most of the drama occurred near the beginning. Wawrinka opened with a break, but Djokovic immediately struck back for 1-all with a forehand winner. The players seemed to still be feeling each other out. At 4-all, the Serb saved several break points- on the last one, an incorrect call was made, but Wawrinka didn’t have any challenges left. After this, though, the set consisted of many easy holds, even far beyond 6-all (as of the time of this match, a final set at the Australian Open continues until one player leads by two games). Finally, with Wawrinka serving at 10-11, Djokovic reached match point with a lucky net cord. The Swiss was made of steel, though, and he saved the match point. Djokovic earned another chance to close out the match, but Wawrinka belted a brave inside-out backhand winner. He reached advantage a couple times with a succession of winners, but couldn’t close out the game. The No. 1 seed gained a third match point, and what followed would be one of the most epic match points ever. After a nervy rally, Wawrinka belted a crosscourt backhand that Djokovic barely kept in play with a sliding return. A huge forehand down the line followed, with a second desperate return. The Swiss approached the net with a slice, and Djokovic passed him with a crosscourt backhand, thrusting his arms skyward. After five hours, the world No. 1 had kept his title defense alive by the skin of his teeth. After a respectful embrace at the net, Djokovic saw fit to tear his shirt off again, as he did following his win over Nadal in the 2012 final.

Djokovic would go on to win the tournament, with his third straight Australian Open. But this match gave Wawrinka the confidence he needed to play with the world’s best. He would get his revenge over Djokovic in the quarterfinals of the Australian Open the following year, winning a five-set epic 2-6, 6-4, 6-2, 3-6, 9-7. He would go on to win his maiden slam title over Nadal in the final. Additionally, Wawrinka has inflicted a couple devastating defeats over Djokovic in the years following, winning four-set matches in the 2015 French Open final and the 2016 U.S. Open final.

2. Djokovic vs. Federer, U.S. Open Semifinal 2011

Final Score: 6-7 (7), 4-6, 6-3, 6-2, 7-5 Djokovic

Djokovic was having a remarkable year, marred just by a 6-7 (5), 3-6, 6-3, 6-7 (5) loss to Federer at the semifinals of the French Open. He’d won the Australian Open and Wimbledon. Federer hadn’t won a major since the 2010 AO, but was still competitive, as the French Open win over Djokovic shows- before that, the Serb had won 43 straight matches.

Djokovic was the favorite to win, but Federer came out strong, taking the first two sets. The first set was exceptionally high quality on both sides, but Djokovic’s level dropped slightly in the second. He came storming back though, decisively taking the next two sets. It appeared that the Serb would close out the match, but Federer delighted the partisan crowd by breaking to love in the eighth game and going up 5-3. With Federer serving for the match, he fell behind love-15, then hit an ace. Djokovic then missed two returns off second serves. 40-15 and two match points. Federer struck a wide first serve, and Djokovic slapped a forehand crosscourt for a winner. The crowd, thinking that the almost haphazard swing had sent the ball wide, begun to cheer before sinking into a bemused near-silence. Djokovic gestured to the crowd as if to say “what do I have to do to get some love?!” The crowd started to cheer, if a bit confusedly, and the Serb had a smile on his face as he prepared to return at 40-30, the second match point. Federer, rattled by the incredible return, missed an easy forehand. At deuce, the Swiss double-faulted. He briefly managed to meet Djokovic at the near-godly level, sending down an ace to save the break point. But there was no stopping the resurgent Djokovic, who produced another break point before Federer double-faulted again to give up the break. The Serb held for 5-all, then broke Federer again, hitting lines all over the court. He then served out the match to seal a famous win.

The historical implications of this match are huge. Djokovic went on to beat Nadal in the final decisively: 6-2, 6-4, 6-7 (3), 6-1. Since Federer gave Djokovic a much tougher fight in the semifinals, it’s not unreasonable to think that Federer could’ve beaten Nadal in the final. To this day, there hasn’t been a “Fedal” matchup at the U.S. Open. This match was one such prevention of a meeting between the two. Also, Djokovic won his third slam of the year, capping an unbelievable year. Had Federer taken one of his two match points, it would’ve still been a great year, but one marred by losses to Federer at slams: he lost to him at the French Open; this match would’ve added a second. It’s crazy- all of this decided by just one shot: Djokovic’s outstanding return when down match point.

1. Federer vs. Nadal, Wimbledon Final 2008

Final Score: 6-4, 6-4, 6-7 (5), 6-7 (8), 9-7 Nadal

For starters, this is widely considered the greatest match of all time. Here is a link to a one-hour highlight video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuQ4tc7jdm4

If you don’t want to watch it all, at least watch the fourth set tiebreak. It’s spectacular sport. Also, if you’ve read this far, thank you. But get ready for the longest match summary yet.

Federer was the world No. 1 going into the match, and had been since January 2004. He had taken the tennis world by a storm, following up his Wimbledon 2003 victory by winning three majors in 2004, two in 2005, three in 2006, and three in 2007. Nadal was really the only player at this time with any kind of consistent success against the Swiss great. He’d beaten Federer in the French Open finals the past three years: 2006, 2007, and 2008, with a complete demolition of Federer in 2008: 6-1, 6-3, 6-0. In turn, Federer had defeated the Spaniard in the 2006 and 2007 Wimbledon finals. But in 2007, Nadal pushed Federer to five sets, his toughest test at Wimbledon yet. Still, Federer had won the last five Wimbledons. Nadal had won the last four French Opens. It was the King of Grass vs. the King of Clay. Though the match took place on Federer’s favored surface, the lawns at SW19 (another name for Wimbledon) Nadal was five years younger and rapidly improving, but had yet to win a title off of the red clay in Paris. Federer had failed to defend his Australian Open title from 2007, and lost to Nadal in the French Open final, leaving him without a major to this point in the year. To add to the drama, if Nadal won, he was sure to take the top spot in the rankings.

Both players had cruised to the final- Nadal dropping one set, Federer none. It was the No. 1 and the No. 2 in a Wimbledon final for the third straight year. What followed was an incredibly high-quality match with a remarkable amount of winners against very few unforced errors. It had two rain delays, a fierce comeback, and all the drama a tennis fan could ask for. Let’s get to the match.

From their previous matches, it was clear that Nadal would use his heavy topspin forehand to hit to Federer’s one-handed backhand. This spin makes the ball bounce higher, forcing Federer to hit the one-hander up around shoulder or neck level. The lefty-righty matchup (Nadal is a lefty, Federer a righty) and this heavy topspin is one of the reasons Nadal has been so successful against the Swiss in the past.

Federer won the toss and chose to serve. On the first point, the world’s two best players traded shots in a high-quality exchange. After hitting a succession of forehands, Federer hit an angled backhand slice that Nadal ran down and curled into the corner for a winner. A shot like that on the opening point makes a statement, and Nadal ensured that Federer knew he would have to fight tooth and nail to keep his title. Though Federer held his first service game, Nadal broke him in his next when the five-time defending champion missed a backhand off a ball that took a bad bounce- the Swiss actually barely clipped the ball, it was more of a swing-and-miss than anything. In any case, Nadal had broken Federer for a 2-1 lead. Despite the Spaniard going up 40-love in his next service game, Federer won four straight points to force a break-back chance. He hit a forehand long, though- if anything were to haunt Federer after this match, it would almost certainly be his break point conversion rate. More on that later.

Nadal closed out the game for 3-1, and the set continued somewhat peacefully until it came time for the Spaniard to serve for the set at 5-4. At 30-all, Nadal hit a couple crosscourt forehands to Federer’s backhand. One of the champion’s replies sat up in the middle of the court, and Nadal fired an inside-out forehand bullet for a winner. This brought up 40-30 and set point, but Federer hit a backhand winner down the line set up by a severely angled forehand. He then put away a volley, earning a break chance, but Nadal saved it. The Swiss would have another break point, but fluffed a terrible chip return into the net off a very makeable second serve. Nadal soon had another set point, which he took when Federer netted a backhand. Nadal pumped his fists- he had won the first set 6-4 over the five-time champion.

Federer started the second set with an easy hold, then, up love-15 on Nadal’s service game, pounded a forehand winner down the line. Though he lost two out of the next three points, at break point, 30-40, the Swiss crushed a crosscourt forehand pass to seal his first break of the match, celebrating with a huge “Come on!” Federer then held to 30 for a 3-0 lead in the second set. Nadal won his next service game, and after the two exchanged holds, Nadal forced a break point with Federer serving. He approached to Nadal’s backhand, but couldn’t handle the Spaniard’s passing shot and hit long. With the second set back on serve, Nadal went up 30-love, and the next point to follow was thrilling. After exchanging a couple shots, Federer jerked Nadal wide with a vicious sliced backhand. Nadal, pulled off the court, hit a screaming crosscourt forehand. Federer lunged and returned it deep with a flailing backhand return. With Nadal off the court, it appeared that the shot was a winner, but Nadal streaked back towards the baseline. Tracking the ball all the way, he ran around it and hit a tweener-esque shot around his body. Federer was completely out of position, shocked that Nadal had made the return, and could only block back a backhand. Two shots later, Nadal sliced into the net, but the message had been made- that’s what you have to do in order to win a point against me. The game would go to deuce, but Nadal escaped potential danger when Federer shockingly hit an easy swing volley long, yelling “Shut up!” to the crowd after. Nadal then levelled at 4-all. In Federer’s service game, Nadal went up love-40 with the help of a beautifully constructed point: Nadal ruthlessly attacked Federer’s backhand, driving the ball deep to the corner. Eventually, Federer returned short and the Spaniard drove a winner into the backhand corner. Federer saved the first break point with a forehand winner, before a great rally ensued on the second. Federer hit a forehand down the line to Nadal’s own forehand, then started to run back to the center of the court. Nadal looped a forehand down the line right back, severely crossing up the Swiss, who lunged and hit a stretch reply that landed right on the baseline. Nadal waited for the ball to drop, then waited some more, and finally drilled an inside-out forehand past Federer, who was completely rooted to the spot. Nadal, serving up 5-4, was pushed to 30-all, but struck back with one of the shots of the match. Federer approached to the backhand, and Nadal hit a beautiful crosscourt slice that cleanly passed the Swiss. Federer would have break points in the game, but on Nadal’s second set point, he netted a backhand to drop the second set. He had a mountainous task ahead of him- the champion was down two sets to Rafael Nadal.

The third set was filled with high quality exchanges and exceptional serving from Federer. The set would go to a tiebreak, but there were two-drama filled games before the breaker. With Nadal serving at 2-3 down, Federer had four break points, but couldn’t convert. Up to this point, the Swiss had had more than ten break points to Nadal’s four, but he’d converted one while the Spaniard had made good on three of his chances. And with the momentum behind him, Nadal forced three break points with Federer serving at 3-all. The world No. 1 escaped two with some great serving, but on the third Nadal fluffed a simple second serve return into the net. I believe that this point and one other in the match transformed this into the greatest match of all time. If Nadal had won that point, the match most likely would’ve finished 6-4, 6-4, 6-4 instead of the five-set epic it was.

Federer closed out the 3-3 game, and the set continued on serve until Federer held for a 5-4 lead. The first rain delay then hit: the ballboys covered the court with a tarp and the players walked off. Generally, a rain delay favors the player who is behind, giving them a chance to regroup and talk strategy with their coach.

Nadal served to save the set down 4-5, and again down 5-6. The set went to a tiebreak. Federer, playing to save his title, won this tiebreak- there’s no other way to say it. Four aces, an unreturnable service winner, an unreachable forehand, and a huge return that almost knocked Nadal down handed Federer his seven points needed to win the breaker: 7-5. The crowd, delighted at the now-extended marquee matchup, erupted. Federer hadn’t evened the match by any means, but his fight had begun.

The match hit its dramatic heights in the fourth set. Both players were hitting great winners throughout the set, with the first tense moment coming with Federer serving down 4-5. He fell behind love-30, two points away from losing the match, but reeled off four straight points to level at 5-all. The world’s top two players exchanged holds and the match headed to another tiebreak. The third set tiebreak was high quality, but it would pale in comparison to the fourth set breaker.

On the first point, with Nadal serving, he approached the net behind a somewhat tentative approach shot. Federer ripped a crosscourt backhand, but Nadal was there with a reflex volley that landed on the baseline. The Swiss then tossed up a lob, and Nadal answered with a leaping backhand smash. It didn’t have quite enough of an angle, though, and Federer’s forehand pass landed in the corner for a winner. Nadal answered with a great return followed by an easy putaway forehand, then won the next three points as well to take a 4-1 lead. The Swiss answered with a winner, but then hit a backhand wide. That miss put his back against the wall- Nadal had two serves coming up while leading 5-2. But the victory shakes seized the Spaniard at the wrong moment, and he double-faulted for 5-3. A simple backhand then found the net to put the tiebreak back on serve with Federer serving down 4-5. A serve-plus-one and a service winner brought up 6-5 and set point for the Swiss. With Nadal serving down set point, a long rally followed a second serve. Federer was on the defensive at first, but a Nadal backhand landed short and the Swiss went for the winner. His attempted forehand down the line went just wide, though, and the players changed sides at 6-6. Federer hit long on the next point: 6-7 and championship point. Federer served quickly, hitting a bullet of a wide serve that Nadal could only hit with the frame of his racket: 7-7. Federer then hit a strong second serve wide, followed by a crosscourt forehand and a smoked forehand down the line. Nadal ran over, stretched, and drilled the ball flat and hard through a tiny window down the line. Federer lunged but couldn’t touch the ball. With Nadal serving at 8-7, championship point, he hit a deep first serve to Federer’s backhand, who chipped the ball back short. The Spaniard hit a crosscourt forehand to Federer’s backhand and charged the net. The defending champion hit a thunderbolt of a backhand down the line that landed in the very corner for a winner. This is the second point that made this an unforgettable match. Federer saved a match point, and two exceptional passing shots were hit back-to-back in the tensest of moments. Still, though, the Swiss had work to do: Nadal was serving at 8-8. Federer returned deep, then ran around a Nadal backhand to hit a forehand. The ball shot off his racket at a sick angle, and he quickly put away Nadal’s desperate return. With Federer serving 9-8 up, Nadal missed a second serve return long. Federer roared in about the biggest celebration you’ll ever see from the normally calm Swiss. He’d evened the match and was taking huge momentum into the fifth set.

The fifth was an odd set. Federer’s service games were pressured early on, and he was taken to deuce at 2-all before the rain started to come down again. Though Federer had made a scintillating comeback, Nadal was holding serve more easily than Federer, so the second rain delay was almost halting his momentum again. Coming back onto court, the Swiss hit back-to-back aces to hold for 3-2. Nadal held for 3-all, then Federer won his next service game to love, sealing it with an ace. With Nadal serving at 3-4, Federer had his best chance in the set. Down 30-15, Federer forced a Nadal error with a severely angled backhand. At 30-all, he hit a bullet forehand winner that tailed away from Nadal. But as he so often does, the Spaniard summoned his best tennis in the most crucial moments. He hit a serve to Federer’s forehand, earning a soft midcourt reply, then hammered an inside-out forehand that set up an easy overhead. Had Nadal lost the point, Federer would have served for the title up 5-3. Instead, another winner sealed the game for Nadal: four games all.

From here, the set was almost one-sided. Federer was two points away from winning with Nadal serving at 4-5, 30-all, but coolly closed out the game. The story of the set was Federer digging deeper and deeper to hold serve, saving break points at 5-5, holding from love-30 down at 6-6, and saved three more break points before finally being broken at 7-all. One more thrilling point was to follow, though: with Nadal serving up 40-30 at 6-7, in which Federer returned two overheads before the Spaniard finally put away an inside-out forehand winner. After Nadal finally secured the break at 7-all, he had to serve for the match with darkness falling rapidly. After losing the first point, Nadal won two points with volley winners, but lost the 30-15 point when he hit a third volley long. At 30-all, Federer framed a backhand wide: 40-30 and a third match point. The champion conjured up one last gesture of resistance, hitting a backhand return so wide that Nadal could only touch it with the end of his racket. At deuce, though, Nadal cleverly changed up his game plan, slamming down a service winner to Federer’s forehand when most serves had been hit to the Swiss’s backhand. And on Nadal’s fourth match point, Federer drove a short forehand into the net. Nadal collapsed flat on his back, screaming in exultation. After five years, Wimbledon had a new champion.

I got carried away with the summary, but this match was a big turning point in tennis history. Federer losing his title and the No. 1 ranking. Nadal grabbing a huge title off the clay. As Nadal dropped to the turf, commentator Andrew Castle cried “There’s a new man at the helm of men’s tennis: Rafael Nadal!” The Spaniard would break Federer’s heart again in the final of the 2009 Australian Open, but the Swiss would win the two majors after that. More than anything, though, this match showed that Federer’s grip on the tennis world was weakening.

What do you think? Should another match be on this list? Disagree with the order? Leave a comment or email me at owenlewis11801@gmail.com

A Look Back at the 2019 Australian Open

By Owen Lewis

At the Australian Open this year, Novak Djokovic stormed to a seventh title Down Under, two-time defending champion Roger Federer lost in the fourth round to Stefanos Tsitsipas, Rafa Nadal taught the “NextGen” a lesson, Petra Kvitová blazed her way to an incredible comeback, Naomi Osaka consolidated her position as the best player in the world, Serena Williams suffered the most shocking collapse of her career, and what does Djokovic’s victory count for in the GOAT debate? Let’s take a closer look.

Federer,Nadal, Djokovic, and the GOAT question

Going into the year’s first major, there was much talk about Nadal’s new serve- he had reportedly developed a new service motion. And the Spaniard delivered an average of six aces per match, significantly above his career average of around two. He also cut a swath through the field up until the final, winning all eighteen sets he played and dropping just six games to Tsitsipas in the semifinals. He also handily beat the young American Frances Tiafoe and 19-year-old Alex de Minaur. Nadal was playing some of his best tennis, and raced to the final about as efficiently as any player has. All of this pointed to the Spaniard winning a second Australian Open title. But in the final, Djokovic handed the world No. 2 his worst loss in a grand slam final to date.

The Serb had looked slightly shakier on his way to the final, dropping sets to 19-year-old Denis Shapovalov and Daniil Medvedev. In the Medvedev match, Djokovic looked physically taxed and the match was closer than the scoreline of 6-4, 6-7 (5), 6-2, 6-3 indicates. After evening the match, Medvedev went 0-40 up with Djokovic serving at 1-2. Chasing down a drop shot, it seemed that the Russian had a chance to break Djokovic at love, but he appeared to stumble and hit the ball into the net. From there, the Serb closed out the game and the set by winning five games on the bounce: 6-2. He then broke Medvedev early in the fourth, and though the six-five Russian had chances to break back, he couldn’t convert and lost the set 6-3. Still, this match made Djokovic look potentially vulnerable.

He wouldn’t be tested for the rest of the tournament. Against Kei Nishikori in the quarters (who was coming off a five-set, five-hour victory against Pablo Carreno Busta) Djokovic went up 6-1, 4-1 before Nishikori retired. In the next round against surprise semifinalist Lucas Pouille, Djokovic committed just five unforced errors in a 6-0, 6-2, 6-2 pulverizing. And in a hugely anticipated rematch of the 2012 final, a six-hour epic, the world’s best put on a clinic, beating the Spaniard 6-3, 6-2, 6-3. Though Nadal seemed to abandon the aggressive style that had gotten him to the final in such promising form, Djokovic was near flawless from the start, committing just nine unforced errors.

And Roger Federer, the current GOAT, shockingly lost in the fourth round to Stefanos Tsitsipas: 6-7 (11), 7-6 (3), 7-5, 7-6 (5). He was 0/12 on break points, including four that would have handed him a two-set lead. It’s the 37-year-old’s third straight early loss at a slam. Take nothing away from the Greek’s victory; he played exceptionally well on the big points, but Federer made 40 unforced errors on his usually reliable forehand, which often anchors the rest of his game.

So, what does this mean for the debate over GOAT? The win marks Djokovic’s seventh victory in Australia and his fifteenth grand slam overall. He sits behind Nadal at seventeen, and Federer at twenty. He has the career slam (7 AO titles, one at the French Open, four Wimbledon titles and three U.S. Open titles). He holds a career head-to-head record against Federer and Nadal (28-25 against Nadal and 25-22 against Federer). He’s won the last three slams and is a good bet to win two more this year. My opinion is that number of slams come first, then variety, then H2H. So if he surpasses Federer’s twenty, I think you’d have to give it to him. As of now, though, the Swiss is the GOAT, and Djokovic is faced with the task of winning at least six more slams, depending on if Federer wins any more. At the French Open, Nadal is almost always going to be the favorite, Djokovic has lost early recently at Indian Wells and Miami, and a young player is sure to break through soon. Also, injuries or personal problems can halt progress, as they have in the past for the Serb. However, he’s on a 21-match winning streak at slams, he’s the clear world No. 1, and he’s the youngest of the “Big Three”. Not to mention, Federer hasn’t won a slam in over a year, and Nadal hasn’t won one since last year’s French Open. I think that by the end of this year, there will be more data points to help predict who will win this career-spanning race, but as of now, one thing is for sure: Federer’s GOAT title is far less stable than it was fourteen months ago.

2. Osaka, Kvitová, and a remarkable final

The women’s final delivered considerably more drama than the men’s. Naomi Osaka, the winner of the previous major (2018 U.S. Open) came out strong, taking the first set in a tiebreak: 7-6 (2). Although Kvitová grabbed a break at the start of the second set, the Japanese star hit back, breaking Kvitová twice to take a 4-2 lead. With the Czech serving at 3-5 down, serving to stay in the match, a remarkable turnaround took place. Osaka won the first three points on Kvitová’s serve. 0-40 and three championship points. Yet the two-time Wimbledon champion saved all three, including a remarkably brave forehand winner. Closing out the hold, the pressure fell on Osaka to serve out the Australian Open. Kvitová was able to hold her momentum, breaking at 15 to even the set at 5-all. One might think the Czech would run away with the set from there, but Osaka pressured her next service game and Kvitová had to survive break point to hold. Now Osaka really did fall apart, dropping her service game to love on a double fault and with it the set. In half an hour, she’d lost three championship points, been broken twice, and seen victory snatched away. Now the match was even and Osaka left the court in tears.

She returned a different player. After a hold on either side, Osaka ripped a crosscourt backhand winner to break for a 2-1 lead. And that proved to be a decisive moment, as the rest of the match went with serve: 6-4 Osaka in the third. New world No. 1, back-to-back grand slam titles, and the first Asian No.1, male or female. But let’s talk about the match for a minute. Often, when a player loses a match point and the momentum, they collapse and the other player runs away with the match. Heck, it happened to Roger Federer at Wimbledon this year (went up two sets, had match point in the third, then lost the point, the set, the next two sets, and the match)! But what I think takes a true fighting spirit is to miss an opportunity like that and still come back to close it out. Nadal did it in the famous Wimbledon 2008 final. Borg did it almost thirty years earlier at the same venue in 1980. And Djokovic did it in 2014, again at SW19. This type of victory takes some serious mental strength. Winning a slam is every tennis player’s dream. Imagine being one point away- just one point! Then losing that point, and watching the opponent grab the momentum and the lead. Many would, and have, faded, allowing the opponent to run away with the match. Instead, Osaka regrouped and sealed an emotional victory.

As for Kvitová, the result of a loss in the final should still be very encouraging. Two years ago, she was the victim of a horrific attack in which an intruder entered her apartment with a knife. She is still on the upswing, and I think that the Czech has more good results in her future if she keeps up her form from AO.

3. Serena’s collapse

In the quarterfinals against Karolina Pliskova, Serena Williams had fought back from a first set loss and taken a seemingly insurmountable 5-1 lead in the deciding set. Serving at 5-1 and match point, the 23-time major champion was called for a foot fault. Some thought that the American would suffer a similar meltdown to that of the 2018 U.S. Open final against Osaka, but Williams appeared to put the call out of her mind. During the point, she stumbled, twisting her ankle, and netted the ball. From there, Pliskova broke, held, broke, held, broke, and held, saving three more match points along the way. Serena Williams, the GOAT of women’s tennis, had just lost six straight games. At a major. In the deciding set. This is not to say that Williams would have won the Australian Open if she’d won this match, but simply put, she can’t afford losses like this. She is 37 and without a single tournament win in two years (yes, Federer is also 37, but he won in Miami this week, made the final of Indian Wells, and won Dubai the week before that). She is anxious to surpass Margaret Court’s record of 24 grand slam titles, but how many more opportunites will she have?

That’s it for this recap, email me with any questions or feedback! Thanks for reading.